Re: [ba-ohs-talk] GPL as a "chaordic" constitution foraugmentation (was re: More bad news...)

To: ba-ohs-talk@bootstrap.org
From: Paul Fernhout <pdfernhout@kurtz-fernhout.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 01:27:31 -0400
Message-id: <3CCA36C3.868EC7A7@kurtz-fernhout.com>

Jack-    (01)

I replied to this but sent it to ba-unrev-talk as it seemed more
appropriate there.    (02)

-Paul Fernhout
Kurtz-Fernhout Software 
=========================================================
Developers of custom software and educational simulations
Creators of the Garden with Insight(TM) garden simulator
http://www.kurtz-fernhout.com    (03)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ba-ohs-talk] GPL as a "chaordic" constitution foraugmentation (was re: More bad news...)
  - From: Jack Park <jackpark@thinkalong.com>

References:
- Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd:[Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts
  - From: Mark Szpakowski <szpak@well.com>
- Re: [ba-ohs-talk] GPL as a "chaordic" constitution for augmentation (was re: More bad news...)
  - From: Jack Park <jackpark@thinkalong.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [ba-ohs-talk] GPL as a "chaordic" constitution for augmentation (was re: More bad news...)
Next by Date: Re: [ba-ohs-talk] GPL as a "chaordic" constitution foraugmentation (was re: More bad news...)
Previous by thread: Re: [ba-ohs-talk] GPL as a "chaordic" constitution for augmentation (was re: More bad news...)
Next by thread: Re: [ba-ohs-talk] GPL as a "chaordic" constitution foraugmentation (was re: More bad news...)
Indexes: Date | Thread | Author