RE: [ba-unrev-talk] Fwd: [issues] Ockham's Razor
Peter -- (01)
The US is not staying local because knee-jerk globalists asked for a
multi-lateral approach. Ho-hum. As if it will make a difference... (02)
America is working within the sham UN system - for now. (03)
Just like your post implies, damned if you do, damned if you don't. (04)
The only imperialist in the picture is the cowardly criminal Kofi Annan
and his failed organization. Because of his phony resolutions,
incompetence, sanctimony and feeble grasp of world events and human
nature, things are going to get very messy in Baghdad once the weather
cools off. (05)
The consequences of UN failures and negligence has yet again turned the
world on itself. It is a shameful disgrace. It flat-out doesn't work. (06)
Please give us a break -- and some posts with merit. (07)
-jtm (08)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ba-unrev-talk@bootstrap.org
[mailto:owner-ba-unrev-talk@bootstrap.org] On Behalf Of Peter Jones
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 3:17 PM
To: ba-unrev-talk@bootstrap.org
Subject: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Fwd: [issues] Ockham's Razor (09)
> local human
> ecosystems driving independence, tradition, values, organic economics
> and politics are back in fashion. (010)
>Today, Sept 14, when
> asked if Iraq deserves 'one more chance,' Bush remarked, 'The UN has
>one more chance.' (011)
So why is the US not staying 'local' in its approach to Iraq now? It
can't be a 'local ecosystem' and imperialist at the same time can it. (012)
Your 'arguments' are not consistent. (013)
--
Peter (014)
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Maloney" <jtmalone@pacbell.net>
To: <ba-unrev-talk@bootstrap.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 10:34 PM
Subject: RE: [ba-unrev-talk] Fwd: [issues] Ockham's Razor (015)