ba-unrev-talk Mailing List (by date)

Indexes: Main | Thread | Date | Author Last Update: Thu Oct 31 17:00:06 GMT 2002

Time (GMT) Subject From # Followups
October 01, 2002
15:56 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] GPL? Teemu Leinonen 1
17:04 RE: [ba-unrev-talk] GPL? Dennis E. Hamilton 0
October 02, 2002
03:08 [ba-unrev-talk] Roundup: an Issue-Tracking System for Knowledge Workers John J. Deneen 1
05:02 [ba-unrev-talk] GNU Founder Richard Stallman to speak at Berkeley John J. Deneen 0
15:50 [ba-unrev-talk] GeekCorps Jack Park 1
16:41 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] GeekCorps Henry K van Eyken 0
19:23 Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Not In Our Name Peter Jones 1
21:43 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Roundup: an Issue-Tracking System for Knowledge Workers Eric Armstrong 1
22:05 RE: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Not In Our Name Garold (Gary) L. Johnson 2
22:23 Re: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Not In Our Name Eric Armstrong 2
22:43 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Roundup: an Issue-Tracking System for Knowledge Workers Eric Armstrong 0
22:56 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] GPL? Eric Armstrong 0
October 03, 2002
00:31 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] GPL? - GCC phobia Eric Armstrong 0
00:57 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Peter's Big Review of ADM WWO Client -- WAS:Re: Peter's ADM features wishlistWas: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] From ADM: Another thought on your inquiry Eric Armstrong 0
03:18 Re: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Not In Our Name Henry K van Eyken 0
03:27 Re: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Not In Our Name Henry K van Eyken 1
06:07 RE: [ba-unrev-talk] GPL? - GCC phobia Dennis E. Hamilton 0
06:58 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Spring stephen white 1
07:22 [ba-unrev-talk] Apple stephen white 0
17:45 Re: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Not In Our Name Peter Jones 2
18:31 RE: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Not In Our Name Garold (Gary) L. Johnson 1
18:47 Re: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Not In Our Name Peter Jones 1
19:38 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Granular Addressability in TEXT documents - ON THE FLY! Peter Jones 0
19:59 Re: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] NotIn Our Name Gerald Pierce 2
20:45 [ba-unrev-talk] Engelbart siting (citing) Eric Armstrong 0
20:49 Re: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Not In Our Name Eric Armstrong 0
20:50 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Spring Eric Armstrong 0
21:04 Re: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Not In Our Name Peter Jones 0
21:09 Re: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] NotIn Our Name Eric Armstrong 0
21:11 [ba-unrev-talk] International Purple Numbering Standard? Peter Jones 4
21:25 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] International Purple Numbering Standard? Eric Armstrong 0
21:41 [ba-unrev-talk] Mug Shots Eric Armstrong 2
21:43 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] International Purple Numbering Standard? Jack Park 1
21:46 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] GPL? - Case-by-Case Eric Armstrong 1
23:08 RE: [ba-unrev-talk] Mug Shots Mei Lin Fung 0
October 04, 2002
00:39 [ba-unrev-talk] ADM is not only an Outliner - its for managing all your projects and information ADM Staff 1
03:28 [ba-unrev-talk] New Possibilities for Linking based on Peirce's theory of Icons, Index, and Symbol. ADM Staff 0
07:26 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] International Purple Numbering Standard? Ihsan Ali Al Darhi 0
14:40 [ba-unrev-talk] Re: International Purple Numbering Standard? Matthew Schneider 3
14:50 RE: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Not In Our Name Garold (Gary) L. Johnson 2
14:58 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Mug Shots Gerald Pierce 0
15:20 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: International Purple Numbering Standard? Matthew Schneider 0
15:29 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: International Purple Numbering Standard? Matthew Schneider 1
16:28 RE: [ba-unrev-talk] GPL? - Case-by-Case Dennis E. Hamilton 0
17:44 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: International Purple Numbering Standard? Peter Jones 0
20:40 Purple Numbering and Transclusion WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] International Purple Numbering Standard? Peter Jones 0
20:43 [ba-unrev-talk] Humor Jack Park 0
21:41 Breaking the Circle WAS: Re: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Not In Our Name Peter Jones 0
23:13 Distinction between `practical certitude' and `certainty' was: RE: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Not In Our Name ADM Staff 1
October 05, 2002
14:50 [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Distinction between `practical certitude' and `certainty' was:RE: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Not In Our Name Gerald Pierce 1
15:16 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Distinction between `practical certitude' and `certainty' was: RE: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Not In Our Name Peter Jones 1
15:23 [ba-unrev-talk] Fw: LAW-AI Digest - 11 Sep 2002 to 4 Oct 2002 (#2002-10) Peter Jones 0
15:23 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Distinction between `practical certitude'and `certainty' was: RE: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk]Not In Our Name Gerald Pierce 1
15:40 [ba-unrev-talk] [Fwd: [MAPPING-CYBERSPACE] The Economist: What does the Internet look like?] Gary Richmond 0
15:40 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Distinction between `practical certitude' and `certainty' was: RE: Facts - an attempted definition WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Not In Our Name Peter Jones 0
17:01 [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Just the facts. Peter Jones 1
October 06, 2002
04:20 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Just the facts. Gerald Pierce 1
10:44 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Just the facts. Peter Jones 1
17:49 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Just the facts. Jack Park 2
18:33 [ba-unrev-talk] PurpleSlurple into Multivalent Browser? Peter Jones 1
18:35 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Just the facts. Peter Jones 0
18:36 [ba-unrev-talk] J2SE License Terms Peter Jones 0
20:52 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Just the facts. Gerald Pierce 1
22:09 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Just the facts. Jack Park 2
22:30 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Just the facts. Gerald Pierce 1
October 07, 2002
03:03 [ba-unrev-talk] Fun With Computers - (How many novel uses can you think of?) ADM Staff 0
03:43 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: International Purple Numbering Standard? Chris Dent 1
15:14 Immutable Granular Addressability: Was: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: International Purple Numbering Standard? SAsites 1
15:47 RE: Immutable Granular Addressability: Was: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: International Purple Numbering Standard? Mei Lin Fung 2
15:47 Using in PurpleSlurple in Other Programs: Was: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] PurpleSlurple into Multivalent Browser? SAsites 0
16:01 [ba-unrev-talk] PurpleSlurple.net SAsites 0
17:01 RE: Immutable Granular Addressability: Was: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re:International Purple Numbering Standard? Barry Gleeson 2
17:10 Cultural v. Technical Solutions [was Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Just the facts.] Jack Park 2
17:16 [ba-unrev-talk] RE: Immutable Granular Addressability: Was: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: International Purple Numbering Standard? Jack Park 1
18:46 RE: [ba-unrev-talk] RE: Immutable Granular Addressability, was ... Barry Gleeson 0
19:21 [ba-unrev-talk] Google, Radio, Blogger, PurpleSlurple3x5 SAsites 0
19:40 [ba-unrev-talk] Immutable Granular Addressability: Rehash? SAsites 2
20:15 IGA Snapshots WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Immutable Granular Addressability: Rehash? Peter Jones 0
20:27 Multivalent Update WAS: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Just the facts. Peter Jones 0
20:28 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Immutable Granular Addressability: Rehash? Chris Dent 1
20:47 Re: Cultural v. Technical Solutions [was Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Just the facts.] Peter Jones 1
21:22 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Immutable Granular Addressability: Rehash? Peter Jones 2
22:42 Re: Cultural v. Technical Solutions [was Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Just the facts.] Jack Park 1
22:47 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Immutable Granular Addressability: Rehash? Peter Jones 1
22:50 Re: Cultural v. Technical Solutions [was Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Just the facts.] Peter Jones 2
23:07 [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Cultural v. Technical Solutions Jack Park 1
23:55 RE: Cultural v. Technical Solutions [was Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Just the facts.] Mei Lin Fung 2
October 08, 2002
03:12 Re: Cultural v. Technical Solutions [was Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Just the facts.] Gerald Pierce 0
03:32 [ba-unrev-talk] The importance of Experience ADM Staff 0
04:24 Re: Cultural v. Technical Solutions [was Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Just the facts.] Gerald Pierce 1
04:36 Re: Cultural v. Technical Solutions [was Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Just the facts.] Jack Park 0
05:11 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Immutable Granular Addressability: Rehash? Chris Dent 0
05:14 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Immutable Granular Addressability: Rehash? Chris Dent 1
11:22 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Cultural v. Technical Solutions Peter Jones 0
13:36 Article: The crisis of expertise Thomas Homer-Dixon 0
14:20 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Immutable Granular Addressability: Rehash? Matthew A. Schneider 0
18:43 [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Cultural v. Technical Solutions John J. Deneen 0
18:50 [ba-unrev-talk] [Fwd: Article: The crisis of expertise] Henry K van Eyken 0
October 09, 2002
03:02 [ba-unrev-talk] Ozzie's Blogs John Maloney 1
12:01 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Ozzie's Blogs Henry K van Eyken 1
October 10, 2002
07:36 [ba-unrev-talk] Whither ba-unrev? Mei Lin Fung 2
22:11 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Whither ba-unrev? Henry K van Eyken 1
October 11, 2002
00:11 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Whither ba-unrev? John Sechrest 1
14:52 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Whither ba-unrev? Matthew Schneider 0
October 12, 2002
06:45 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Whither ba-unrev? Henry K van Eyken 1
14:12 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Whither ba-unrev? Kathryn La Barre 0
16:11 [ba-unrev-talk] Knowledge management stephen white 1
16:24 [ba-unrev-talk] Scopeware stephen white 2
16:29 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Scopeware Gary Richmond 1
16:53 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Scopeware stephen white 1
18:09 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Scopeware Gary Richmond 0
18:43 RE: [ba-unrev-talk] Scopeware Garold (Gary) L. Johnson 2
19:22 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Scopeware Gerald Pierce 2
19:29 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Scopeware Gerald Pierce 0
19:43 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Scopeware stephen white 1
21:18 [ba-unrev-talk] Articles about Doug's forthcoming visit Mei Lin Fung 0
22:24 [ba-unrev-talk] Seemap Visual Language System for modelling business (and maybe other) forms of complexity. ADM Staff 3
October 13, 2002
06:30 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Seemap Visual Language System for modelling business (and maybe other) forms of complexity. stephen white 0
October 14, 2002
11:10 [ba-unrev-talk] Humble pie in academia Henry K van Eyken 4
13:40 RE: [ba-unrev-talk] Humble pie in academia Dennis E. Hamilton 1
13:41 RE: [ba-unrev-talk] Humble pie in academia Dennis E. Hamilton 0
15:40 [ba-unrev-talk] NYTimes.com Article: Site for the Truly Geeky Makes a Few Bucks garyrichmond 0
15:44 [ba-unrev-talk] NYTimes.com Article: Debate on Intellectual Property garyrichmond 0
19:26 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Seemap Visual Language System for modellingbusiness (and maybe other) forms of complexity. da - dan ancona 0
21:46 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Knowledge management Eric Armstrong 0
21:52 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Scopeware da - dan ancona 1
23:24 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Scopeware Eric Armstrong 0
23:42 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Humble pie in academia Eric Armstrong 1
October 15, 2002
00:01 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Humble pie in academia stephen white 3
01:16 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Humble pie in academia Eric Armstrong 1
01:26 [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Ruby for learning O-O concepts Eric Armstrong 0
01:45 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Humble pie in academia Eric Armstrong 2
01:51 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Humble pie in academia stephen white 0
02:06 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Humble pie in academia stephen white 1
02:25 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Humble pie in academia Eric Armstrong 0
03:22 RE: [ba-unrev-talk] Humble pie in academia Garold (Gary) L. Johnson 0
06:42 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Humble pie in academia Henry K van Eyken 1
11:06 RE: [ba-unrev-talk] Seemap Visual Language System for modelingbusiness (and maybe other) forms of complexity. John Maloney 1
17:21 [ba-unrev-talk] Opera: Transclusion by Browser (or PurpleSlurple for the masses) Matthew Schneider 0
18:12 [ba-unrev-talk] Saving AOL Jack Park 0
20:45 [ba-unrev-talk] More on Ruby Eric Armstrong 0
21:33 RE: [ba-unrev-talk] Seemap Visual Language System for modeling business (and maybe other) forms of complexity. ADM Staff 1
21:47 RE: [ba-unrev-talk] Seemap Visual Language System for modeling business (and maybe other) forms of complexity. Jack Park 0
October 16, 2002
00:37 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Humble pie in academia Eric Armstrong 1
00:52 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Humble pie in academia Eric Armstrong 2
04:12 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Humble pie in academia Henry K van Eyken 1
04:26 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Humble pie in academia Jack Park 0
07:21 [ba-unrev-talk] My two bits: Java Text Matthew Schneider 1
16:20 [ba-unrev-talk] Fwd: New book on global brain Jack Park 1
19:07 [ba-unrev-talk] Fwd: [xml-dev] fwd: metaphorical Web Jack Park 0
19:38 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Humble pie in academia Henry K van Eyken 0
October 17, 2002
00:01 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] My two bits: Java Text Eric Armstrong 1
03:19 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] My two bits: Java Text Henry K van Eyken 0
October 18, 2002
16:20 [ba-unrev-talk] Keeping Fleabyte on Linux Henry K van Eyken 0
23:42 [ba-unrev-talk] From Eric S.: Call to Human Augmentation people in the Bay area for Face-to-Face Dialogue! ADM Staff 0
October 20, 2002
11:23 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Keeping Fleabyte on Linux Henry K van Eyken 1
12:47 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Keeping Fleabyte on Linux Bill Bearden 1
13:15 [ba-unrev-talk] UNDO! (was Keeping Fleabyte on Linux) Bill Bearden 0
15:04 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Keeping Fleabyte on Linux Henry K van Eyken 1
17:31 [ba-unrev-talk] Interpersonal Information Manager Jack Park 1
18:11 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Keeping Fleabyte on Linux Matthew Schneider 1
18:18 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Interpersonal Information Manager Henry K van Eyken 0
18:40 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Keeping Fleabyte on Linux Henry K van Eyken 0
October 22, 2002
06:14 [ba-unrev-talk] Jon Bosak speaking in SF Bay Area on UBL Mei Lin Fung 0
23:50 [ba-unrev-talk] IBIS facilitation workshop in Bay Area Jeff Conklin 0
October 23, 2002
17:53 [ba-unrev-talk] Fwd: Re: A few here may have an opinion on this Jack Park 1
19:18 [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Fwd: Re: A few here may have an opinion on this Jack Park 1
20:11 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Fwd: Re: A few here may have an opinion on this Eric Armstrong 1
21:03 RE: [ba-unrev-talk] Fwd: Re: A few here may have an opinion on this Dennis E. Hamilton 0
21:25 [ba-unrev-talk] OT: Preservation of Public Domain Works Dennis E. Hamilton 0
21:25 RE: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Fwd: Re: A few here may have an opinion on this Dennis E. Hamilton 0
22:07 [ba-unrev-talk] More Fwd: RE: A few here may have an opinion on this Jack Park 0
October 24, 2002
02:37 [ba-unrev-talk] Fwd: Group-forming mailing list Jack Park 0
17:51 [ba-unrev-talk] ClimatePrediction@HOME Jack Park 0
17:56 [ba-unrev-talk] Online Communities Jack Park 1
20:25 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Online Communities Eric Armstrong 1
22:33 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Online Communities Henry K van Eyken 1
October 25, 2002
06:53 RE: [ba-unrev-talk] Online Communities Dennis E. Hamilton 1
12:10 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Online Communities Henry K van Eyken 0
October 27, 2002
16:58 Re: Deschoolin Society / Creating Learning Communities Henry K van Eyken 1
17:17 [ba-unrev-talk] [Fwd: Re: Deschoolin Society / Creating Learning Communities] Henry K van Eyken 0
18:39 [ba-unrev-talk] Tinderbox stephen white 0
20:35 [ba-unrev-talk] RE: Deschoolin Society / Creating Learning Communities Dennis E. Hamilton 2
21:33 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] RE: Deschoolin Society / Creating Learning Communities Jack Park 1
October 28, 2002
03:11 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] RE: Deschoolin Society / Creating Learning Communities Henry K van Eyken 0
12:23 [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Deschoolin Society / Creating Learning Communities Henry K van Eyken 0
16:49 RE: [ba-unrev-talk] RE: Deschoolin Society / Creating Learning Communities Dennis E. Hamilton 0
23:12 [ba-unrev-talk] Re: ADM is not only an Outliner - its for managing all your projects and information Eric Armstrong 1
23:43 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Corporate Morality Eric Armstrong 1
23:49 [ba-unrev-talk] Amazon's Ratings -- Editable! Eric Armstrong 0
October 29, 2002
15:15 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Corporate Morality stephen white 1
19:20 [ba-unrev-talk] Fwd: Removal Request Jack Park 1
20:55 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Fwd: Removal Request Eric Armstrong 0
21:04 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: Corporate Morality Eric Armstrong 0
22:16 [ba-unrev-talk] Response from ADM to Eric Armstrongs review of our product. ADM Staff 1
October 30, 2002
00:01 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Response from ADM to Eric Armstrongs review of our product. Eric Armstrong 1
October 31, 2002
00:30 Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Response from ADM to Eric Armstrongs review of our product. ADM Staff 0
16:50 [ba-unrev-talk] FW: [IP] harmonious contention, cheating, and antitrust enforcement Jack Park 0

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.2