Jack Park wrote:
> So, why not let's enumerate the problems of knowledge representation we want
> to solve, then start from there.
As a start, here are some issues inspired by William Kent's 1979 book
"Data & Reality"'s index and examples of when they come up.
* Entities (quantity, change, categories, existence)
Ex. You're reading a mystery novel (building up knowledge structures in
a DKR as you go along) and as the end it says "The butler did it". What
happens to those structures? (Kent's example).
* Separating symbols and things
Ex. When I say "tomato" that isn't everything I know about Tomatoes or
everything the DKR knows about them.... Somehow that symbol can access
additional information. How is this relationship between symbol and
related data maintained? (And of course, we have to acknowledge, you
can't eat the symbol "tomato".)
* Naming (uniqueness, scope, qualifiers)
Ex. You say "tomato" and refer to a vegetable, and enter a reference
into the DKR, I say "tomato" and refer to a set of nutrition information
and try to enter that refernece in the same DKR. How do we keep these
same named references referring to different things? And likewise, if I
use the scientific name for Tomato (?) how do we have it point to the
same thing as some other reference to "tomato".
* Representing relationships (items, domain, role, issues if computed)
Ex. You make a link to the Tomato nutritional information from a report
in the DKR. How is this relationship maintained? Some of the vegetables
you reference have pictures, how do you build this link (relationship)
when you didn't plan for it? Some of the nutritional information about
a tomato is calculated -- how do you distinguish this from other
* Attributes to objects vs. relationships
Ex. Tomato's have weight. If you are inventorying your tomato harvest in
a DKR, should you have a tomato class which has a weight attribute, or
should you model this had a tomato being in a relationship with a
* Why data and its description can't really be separated
Ex. You want to send someone you tomato nutritional information so they
can store it in another DKR. But in order to use it, they need to know
about what format you stored it in.
* Handling types and categories and sets
Ex. (Weak!) What does it mean that nutritional information is about a
type of Tomato? Does that then mean nutritional information can't be a
type of empirical observation? Can it belong to the set of things your
friend Fred entered for you, while ate the same time being in the
category of things Jim fact checked? How is all this represented?
Are actegories just relationships in disquise?
* Modeling -- both modeling reality and modeling data
Ex. Simulating the movement of air over a wing vs. discussing the way
you implemented this, and also realizing your simulation is not reality
(the map is not the territory -- but it is its own territory).
* Handling elementary data (example: images or integers)
Ex. Should an image stored in the DKR be made of relationships of bytes
(and those relationships of bits?) or should it just be an array of
bytes on a hard disk. In either case, how do you know how to interpret
those bytes back into an image?
* Data integrity
Ex. For a DKR on tropical medicine, how do you make sure the weights of
tomato plant parts entered do not add up to more than the weight of the
entire tomato plant?
* Data processes (triggers, integrity constrains, search)
Ex. When you enter a record for tomato RDA by weight into your DKR, how
can the DKR be set up to automatically send email to Eric to let him
know to look it over?
* Handling multiple versions of things or patterns
Over time, we are going to get better information about tomato
nutritional values. How do we keep all these versions of information?
Which one do I give you when you ask for nutritional information on the
* Testing for sameness (equality)
How do I know that this reference to tomato nutritional information
points to the same "thing" that this reference to "red fruit"
nutritional information points to?
Ex. Same as handling elementary data, also how does how the system looks
to a user differ from how it is implemented.
These are just some of the types of issues. As you can see, "XML" has
nothing to say about almost all of these issues.
Developers of custom software and educational simulations
Creators of the Garden with Insight(TM) garden simulator
LOW RATE, NO WAIT!
Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds! Get rates
as low as 2.9% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees.
Community email addresses:
Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
List owner: unrev-IIemail@example.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 05 2000 - 05:31:17 PDT