I appreciate the encouraging words.
Of course you are right about "co-evolution". I will try to generalize the
first sentence ("This is the idea...") and make the
human-and-tool-co-evolution thing more into an example.
From: Henry van Eyken [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: [unrev-II] Glossary - just breaking the ice on this task
This ought to become very useful for getting newbies feel at home
quickly and painlessly. It seems to me that, once satisfactorily developed,
the glossary should become part and parcel with the other content of the
Colloquium section of the Bootstrap Institute's website.
P.S. Although the term co-evolution has been used mostly in the context
of synching human system with tool system v.v., I imagine that it applies to
human interdependence and indeed tool interdependence as well.
Bill Bearden wrote:
Co-Evolution - Evolution in sync - This is the idea that it does no
good for Tool System to advance to the point that people can't use them.
Tool Systems must advance in sync with the evolution of Human Systems.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 02 2000 - 06:19:54 PDT