Re: [unrev-II] Re: Tuesday's meeting

From: Eric Armstrong (
Date: Wed Nov 15 2000 - 16:30:36 PST

  • Next message: Eric Armstrong: "Re: [unrev-II] Stardates"

    It's a sign of the fact that the terms have never
    been defined, I think, that I have never conceived
    of the OHS as a toolset, while you clearly have.

    I have always seen the OHS as some sort of repository.
    That is not necessarily the most ideal or the most
    useful vision -- its just the one I have always had.

    You, on the other hand, have a very different vision,
    that appears to be based on documents I am unfamiliar
    with. At least, I don't recall seeing anything that
    described things in that way.

    Apparently, you are of a school that sees the OHS
    as thing that looks into the DKR? I've heard others
    talking in that fashion, but have never understood
    that particular view of things.

    I agree that consistent terminology is necessary.
    At Tuesday's meeting, we consistently referred to
    the OHS as though it were a repository with a
    functional interface, and no one seemed to be
    adverse to that label.

    I think the design makes sense, regardless of what
    we label the components, but I agree that consistent
    labeling is desirable.

    Your turn...

    -------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
    Create your business web site your way now at
    It's the fast, easy way to get online, to promote your business,
    and to sell your products and services. Try now.

    Community email addresses:
      Post message:
      List owner:

    Shortcut URL to this page:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 15 2000 - 16:40:48 PST