----- Original Message -----
From: Eugene Eric Kim <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: *MLs come later?
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, N. C a r r o l l wrote:
> > Gack indeed. Anyway I think *MLs are getting
> > premature attention. From Doug and most folks who
> > are looking at the lower levels, tables seems to be
> > the consensus.
> I don't understand what you mean by this.
I mean that XML, SGML, etc., keep popping up as
fundamental parts of architecture. At one time views were
expressed that data would actually be stored in XML
files. But tables still work, all the way down to the hard
-- ________________________________ Nicholas Carroll email@example.com Travel: firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.hastingsresearch.com ________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 17:58:01 PDT