[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Augment data models posted
So you need a construct that is something like:
Eugene Eric Kim wrote: (02)
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Eric Armstrong wrote:
> > Resending to the list instead of Eugene, at Eugene's
> > request, so the question can be archived.
> Thanks, Eric.
> > > On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Eric Armstrong wrote:
> > >
> > > > In answer to the original question:
> > > > Is there any way to define link types??
> > > > That's needed, to distinguish pure hierarchy (subnode)
> > > > from transclusions and cyclic links (iref).
> In a sense, noderel does define link types. In the Groves world, there
> are only three: subnode, iref, and uref. Additionally, as far as I can
> tell, it imposes the link type on all nodes in a property. This is the
> problem. If I could define noderel to be both subnode and iref (and
> perhaps even uref), then this would take care of the transclusions issue.
> Note that Lee gets around this problem by avoiding it altogether. :-)
> There are no link types, or relationship constraints, in the NODAL data
> modeling language.
> +=== Eugene Eric Kim ===== email@example.com ===== http://www.eekim.com/ ===+
> | "Writer's block is a fancy term made up by whiners so they |
> +===== can have an excuse to drink alcohol." --Steve Martin ===========+ (03)