Eric,
In another letter, I sent a link to a summary of the 14 points (which is
beginning to take on Wilsonian dimensions). Was hoping we might discuss this
stuff on the phone, but it can wait until tomorrow.
http://www.welchco.com/sd/08/00101/02/00/04/07/115815.HTM
It only takes a click to pop an item to summary, but I was hesitant because KM
is complex, and sometimes this fact is not appreciated, with the result that we
rush ahead without really being aware of nuance that impacts the ability to get
where we want to go.
Rod
Eric Armstrong wrote:
> As long as the result is a list of agenda items that
> we can prioritize and send out to the list, any way
> we get there is ok.
>
> As a meta-point, we are illustrating the need to reuse
> DKR information in other venues. Here, for example, we
> need a simple list of those 14 points. I take it that
> is somewhat difficult to extract from your current
> version of your system.
>
> We need to capture the ability to do so easily as a
> requirement of any system we build. (For example, the
> ability to collapse the hierarchy and select only what
> is currently displayed.
>
> I'll add that as a use case.
>
> Rod Welch wrote:
> >
> > Eric,
> >
> > Usually, Doug or Lee or somebody has a notebook computer at the
> > meetings. Would it be okay to just jump on the Internet and use the
> > record for talking points? That would provide access to background
> > and support information, if needed, to guide the discussion, rather
> > than relying on memory.
> >
> > This might also provide a good example to explain technical
> > improvements contemplated by the use case analysis underway, i.e.,
> > here is one way of doing things without the OHS DKR, and here is how
> > we are going to improve it.
> >
> > Rod
> >
> > Eric Armstrong wrote:
> >
> > > Cool, Rod.
> > > Can you bring or send a one-item per line list of those
> > > 14 possibilities?
> > >
> > > Rod Welch wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Eric,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for replying, and for the promotion. I am not in charge of
> > >
> > > > anything, but am happy to contribute where possible and acceptable
> > > to
> > > > the team. Sponsorship and business model relate to technical
> > > agenda
> > > > with respect to selecting immediate targets for development that
> > > align
> > > > with demand, which roughly and eventually correlates with actual
> > > > need. We have to balance these issues, as discussed at the
> > > meeting on
> > > > 000324...
> > > >
> > > > http://www.welchco.com/sd/08/00101/02/00/03/24/160030.HTM#7030
> > > >
> > > > The link to a "few items" lists 14 possible agenda issues for
> > > project
> > > > meetings....
> > > >
> > > > http://www.welchco.com/sd/08/00101/02/00/04/07/115815.HTM#6554
> > > >
> > > > The first sentence or so of each item is a sort of summary, but I
> > > > agree some of the explanations are a bit lengthy.
> > > >
> > > > Business model and sponsorship are items 10 and 14. The other 12
> > > seem
> > > > "technical," but maybe not. Sometimes it helps to talk a bit
> > > about
> > > > writings. My number is 415 781 5700. I'll be here until OA
> > > 0800p,
> > > > then will be at 925 680 8947. Give me a call, or let me know
> > > where I
> > > > can reach you. Anyone on the team can help maintain project
> > > momentum
> > > > with suggestions on agenda issues for the weekly progress
> > > meetings.
> > > >
> > > > In any case, we should try to review with the team tomorrow
> > > possible
> > > > agenda issues for the period ahead, and strive for consensus on
> > > what
> > > > needs to get done over the next 3 to 4 weeks.
> > > >
> > > > Rod
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Eric Armstrong wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Rod:
> > > > > Sponsorship and business model fall outside the
> > > > > technical agenda I'm sheparding. I believe you're
> > > > > in charge of running meetings on that aspect of
> > > > > things.
> > > > >
> > > > > I followed the link on that page, but saw a detailed
> > > > > report, not a list of possible items. Can you summarize
> > > > > and post?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Rod Welch wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Eric,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please see my letter suggesting possible agenda items....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.welchco.com/04/00067/61/00/04/1101.HTM#0001
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rod
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Eric Armstrong wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Summary for 6 Apr 2000
> > > > > > > -----------------------
> > > > > > > 1. We decided that in order to achieve the maximum
> > > > > > > "bootstrap" effect, our initial focus would be an
> > > > > > > OHS that aims to improve (distributed) open source
> > > > > > > development
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2. We decided to investigate the Software Carpentry
> > > > > > > effort, LXR, and the Software Development Standard
> > > > > > > to see where we can dovetail efforts. See:
> > > > > > > http://www.softwarecarpentry.org
> > > > > > > ___LXR link to be provided___
> > > > > > > http://sds.sourceforge.net
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Agenda for 13 Apr
> > > > > > > -----------------
> > > > > > > 1. Doug's "Vector"
> > > > > > > --investigation of transcoding
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2. Software Carpentry presentation
> > > > > > > (tentative)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3. "Joe's Picture" presentation
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --Comments?
> > > > > > > --Any other candidates for the next meeting?
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Community email addresses:
> > > > > > > Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
> > > > > > > Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
> > > > > > > Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
> > > > > > > List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Shortcut URL to this page:
> > > > > > > http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
> > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > > > [Join Garden.com's affiliate program and enjoy numerous
> > > benefits. To learn more click here:]
> > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > > > Community email addresses:
> > > > > Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
> > > > > Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
> > > > > Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
> > > > > List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
> > > > >
> > > > > Shortcut URL to this page:
> > > > > http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > [Join Garden.com's affiliate program and enjoy numerous benefits. To learn
> more click here:]
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Community email addresses:
> > > Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
> > > Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
> > > Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
> > > List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
> > >
> > > Shortcut URL to this page:
> > > http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Join Garden.com's affiliate program and enjoy numerous benefits. To learn more click here:]
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Community email addresses:
> Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
> Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
> Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
> List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
>
> Shortcut URL to this page:
> http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 12 2000 - 21:15:42 PDT