Re: [unrev-II] [Fwd: Knexa/Peerview to Revolutionize Scholarly Pu blishing]

From: Eric Armstrong (eric.armstrong@eng.sun.com)
Date: Tue Apr 24 2001 - 14:03:28 PDT

Next message: Dennis E. Hamilton: "RE: [unrev-II] The Economist's software survey"

Previous message: Eric Armstrong: "Re: [unrev-II] Cycorp's ontology program: OpenCyc for “Enabling the Semantic Web""
In reply to: Jack Park: "Re: [unrev-II] [Fwd: Knexa/Peerview to Revolutionize Scholarly Pu blishing]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Jack Park wrote:
>
> Scientists demand open access to research:
> http://slashdot.org/science/01/04/24/149257.shtml
>
Yes. I will be highly surprised if any kind of "pay for
information" model actually succeeds. I might pay for
the platform that will allow me to publish and access
information, and for better search tools and what not
that integrate with that platform. But beyond that, I'm
not sure there is a revenue model that makes sense.

Community email addresses:
  Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
  Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
  Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
  List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com

Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Next message: Dennis E. Hamilton: "RE: [unrev-II] The Economist's software survey"
Previous message: Eric Armstrong: "Re: [unrev-II] Cycorp's ontology program: OpenCyc for “Enabling the Semantic Web""
In reply to: Jack Park: "Re: [unrev-II] [Fwd: Knexa/Peerview to Revolutionize Scholarly Pu blishing]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 24 2001 - 14:15:41 PDT