Client side storage, SETI "R" Us.

From: N. C a r r o l l (ncarroll@hastingsresearch.com)
Date: Fri Feb 16 2001 - 10:39:38 PST

Next message: Eugene Eric Kim: "the purpose of Paths"
Previous message: Jack Park: "Re: Node scheme, how much storage for metadata?"
In reply to: Lee Iverson: "Re: Node scheme, how much storage for metadata?"
Next in thread: Eugene Eric Kim: "the purpose of Paths"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Lee Iverson <leei@ai.sri.com>
To: <ohs-dev@bootstrap.org
>
> >(I'm ignoring path data storage here.)
>
> Don't ignore it. Put simply, Paths are client-side, transient objects --
> they are context holders. Path Descriptions would, however, be stored in
> the Repository.

Check. Will mull over the client-side question at
some point. The P2P startups are using VC
mathmatics -- 25 p2p business plans, each based
upon being able to snarf 20% of the world's
unused storage. SETI "R" us....

--
________________________________
Nicholas Carroll
ncarroll@hastingsresearch.com
Travel: ncarroll@iname.com
http://www.hastingsresearch.com
________________________________

Next message: Eugene Eric Kim: "the purpose of Paths"
Previous message: Jack Park: "Re: Node scheme, how much storage for metadata?"
In reply to: Lee Iverson: "Re: Node scheme, how much storage for metadata?"
Next in thread: Eugene Eric Kim: "the purpose of Paths"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 17:58:02 PDT