RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Re: Rethinking Licensing
Mei-Lin -- (01)
"May I propose that we use the BA-OHS-Talk list in the manner
suggested by Chris Dent below, and that we move all other discussion to
unrev?" (02)
Excellent suggestion. You have my vote to implement immediately. (03)
Cheers, (04)
John (05)
John Maloney
www.kmcluster.com
Email: jtmalone@pacbell.net
Tel: 415.902.9676
eFax: 415.276.6074
IM:jheuristic (06)
Create the Future! Join the KM Cluster --
http://www.kmcluster.com/register.htm (07)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ba-ohs-talk@bootstrap.org
[mailto:owner-ba-ohs-talk@bootstrap.org]On Behalf Of Mei Lin Fung
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 3:53 PM
To: ba-ohs-talk@bootstrap.org
Subject: RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Re: Rethinking Licensing (08)
Going back to a thread started by Chris Dent May 21, where he said
should there be a list devoted to OHS specs and code, discussed in a
focused fashion. (09)
There is not a lot of traffic on the unrev list at the moment, as far as
I can see. May I propose that we use the BA-OHS-Talk list in the manner
suggested by Chris Dent below, and that we move all other discussion to
unrev? Please let us know how you feel about this. Can we reach a group
consensus? Here's why I'm making the suggestion. (010)