RE: [ba-ohs-talk] FW: IBIS vocabulary (RDF, PSIs)
>The generalized Argument is a node which is capable of satisfying two
>different arcs. One argument can be, at once, pro to one idea and con to
>another. (01)
Thanks Jack, I was hoping I'd understood that. I'm still having a little
trouble representing some maps, but I think this will only call for a bit of
tweaking, I reckon the basic model's about right. (02)
>A Map node is one in which you take off in a linked, but perhaps
>orthogonal
>direction. Using the Map node, it becomes possible to build maps of maps,
>maps of many discussions. (03)
This becomes very interesting through RDF glasses (or opens a can of worms,
depending on how you look at it ;-) There's been quite a lot of discussion
on the difference between documents and graphs, for example what should be
at the end of an rdf:seeAlso arc. Specifying this as a map (of some sort)
offers a lot of potential for progress in practice, but there are still
questions like 'should the items (statements) within Map B be considered a
logical part of map A?' to be dealt with. (04)
Cheers,
Danny. (05)