RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a StandardGraph-Based...")
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Danny Ayers wrote: (01)
> Hmm, I'm sure you have good reason to use something other than URIs for (02)
afaik the cryptographic content hash forms the URI (urn-5) (03)
> nodeA graphics:x "17"
> nodeA graphics:x "18"
> even if nodeA is a URI (04)
yes this is new to us after zz ..
(zzstructure uses clones for that) (05)
> so some kind of contextualization is needed anyway. So the lines along which (06)
exactly. (07)
> I was thinking were more like :
> canvasX{
> nodeA graphics:x "17"
> }
>
> canvasY{
> nodeA graphics:x "18"
> } (08)
but quite often with rdf one node may be in several places on one canvas,
with the views we are using that is. or did i miss the point here? (09)
> vocab. Anyhow, I'm still tinkering with much cruder stuff at present though,
> plenty of time to think about this... (010)
i guess that's good, too :)
(and there is much for us as well) (011)
> Cheers,
> Danny. (012)
to you too,
~Toni (013)