[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] Indexes: Main | Date | Thread | Author

Re: [ba-unrev-talk] An approach to a simpler truth.


I read of a review of this in the Sunday Times (UK).
It looks like it will be seen as a very important work.    (01)

-- 
Peter
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Henry K van Eyken" <vaneyken@sympatico.ca>
To: <ba-unrev-talk@bootstrap.org>
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] An approach to a simpler truth.    (02)


> I haven't been able to follow some of the recent threads, but I do believe
> the following is elevant:
> 
> http://www.economist.com/printedition/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=1337125
> 
> This is The Economist's review of Steven Pinker's latest, "The Blank Slate:
> The Modern Denial of Human Nature"
> 
> and the insights it offers may do much to bring our understanding of
> ourselves as human beings closer to the frontiers of scientific thinking.
> 
> I shall be obtaining a copy to read it myself - leaving me even less time -
> because I sense that it may be exceedingly relevant to such matters of human
> community as democracy, etc.
> 
> Henry
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Henry
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Graham Stalker-Wilde wrote:
> 
> > Nietzsche's version of karma (the eternal recurrence) is delightfully non
> > religious.
> >
> > If we reincarnated based on past performance that would perhaps make us
> > behave well, if we believed it, if we behaved rationally, but if we knew
> > this was our one and only life? If we knew every moment was unrepeatable?
> > How well ought we to behave then?
> >
> > -g
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ba-unrev-talk@bootstrap.org
> > [mailto:owner-ba-unrev-talk@bootstrap.org]On Behalf Of Eric Armstrong
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 6:50 PM
> > To: ba-unrev-talk@bootstrap.org
> > Subject: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] An approach to a simpler truth.
> >
> > V.S.Uren@open.ac.uk wrote:
> > >
> > >         Re: I've long been intrigued by the notion of finding a
> > > rationalization
> > > > for doing good to others that *wasn't* based on religion. Such
> > > > a thing could go a long way to reduce religious prejudice, as well
> > > > as the worst of captialism. Equilibrium theory holds promise...
> > > >
> > >         This sounds like a notion I call "practical karma"...
> > >
> > Yes. A belief in reincarnation is a *powerful* motivation for doing
> > good. I look at it this way:
> >
> >      It's not that I'm going to come back as a llama or an earthworm,
> >      or something.
> >
> >      It's not even that I'm going to come back as some high-born or
> >      low-born person.
> >
> >      It's that I'm going to come back to THIS world -- and I'm going
> >      to have live in the garden of eden (or cesspool) I create.
> >
> >      Talk about incentive to take care of the environment...
> >
> > But those are quasi-religious notions. At the very least, they
> > depend on a particular belief system.
> 
>     (03)