I know you're right Eric but that's probably where interdisciplinarity
breaks down.
Gil
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Armstrong [mailto:eric.armstrong@eng.sun.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 2:37 PM
To: unrev-II@onelist.com
Subject: Re: [unrev-II] Profound Thinking (was: Improving education (why
are we doing what?))
From: Eric Armstrong <eric.armstrong@eng.sun.com>
> Gil Regev wrote:
>
> Don't you think that by separating the list in 2 you will also be
> creating a divide that will make it much more difficult to borrow
> ideas from one to the other? Isn't the fact that "the discussions
> themselves so mutually antipathetic to many important contributors"
> just a sign of the need for accomodation as described by Henry?
>
Actually, I think more will be gained by the separation than is
lost. I'll be on both. Wouldn't have it any other way. But I
think that many potential contributors to either list are put of
by messages they perceive as "off-target". I want maximum input
in both areas, hence the desire to separate.
I'd be quite happy to find out my assumption is incorrect -- that
all the coders delight in the high level discussions and the
big topic thinkers are not bored by interminable coding discussions,
but experience suggests otherwise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Community email addresses: Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
Shortcut URL to this page: http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 18:56:51 PDT