Eric,
A concrete example would make it make it easier to grasp your idea, and the
improvement contemplated. The record of the DKR meeting on 000324 shows a
summary, for example, and identifies some responses.
http://www.welchco.com/sd/08/00101/02/00/03/24/160030.HTM
Does this use case relate to that situation, or can you point to another example
in the project record that illustrates this use case....
http://welchco.com/04/00067/63/00401.HTM
Thanks.
Rod
Eric Armstrong wrote:
> A node collects a number of responses, arguments
> and counter arguments in a deep hierarchy.
>
> Person 1 writes a "summary" of the arguments
> for and the arguments against.
>
> The new nodes need to replace the original set
> of nodes, and yet link to them. (Given responses
> +1, +2, -1, -2, the +summary should replace +1
> and +2, while the -summary should replace -1
> and -2.)
>
> Meanwhile, Person 2 also writes a summary that aims
> to replace the arguments. The two summaries are
> now "siblings", each of get evaluated by others.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Community email addresses:
> Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
> Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
> Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
> List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
>
> Shortcut URL to this page:
> http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 12 2000 - 13:45:09 PDT