Re: [unrev-II] Eric's Summary [edited]

From: Eric Armstrong (
Date: Tue Apr 25 2000 - 13:10:44 PDT

  • Next message: Eric Armstrong: "[unrev-II] Groupware and Corporate Repositories"

    Jack Park wrote:
    > Folks, I am beginning to see a bifurcation emerging. There's the
    > group that is pressing on with use cases, licenses, and so forth
    > -- all extremely important, as Eric correctly points out, and there
    > is the group that appears to want to steer the discussion closer to
    > the suggestions placed before us by Doug.
    Do you or Adam want to chair that group?
    Maybe we could do that at the next meeting.
    It's reasonable to see some discussion of that proposal.
    Do we have anything solid to discuss?

    > A while back, Eric asked me for suggestions regarding development of
    > use cases. I replied with something akin to a 10-point sequence,
    > which he has ignored.
    Not my intention, I assure you. I plead humanity.
    I have this note in my mail box:

      Jack Park wrote:
    > ...I already proposed the header Knowledge Representation 2 to
    > be given over to Use Cases...

    As I recall the original mail, it posited a 10-step process, or 10
    discussion threads, if you will, of which Use Cases was thread number
    2. I don't recall that it had a lot of specific use cases, but I may
    have overlooked something. I can't find it in my mail folders, either.
    Can you repost it?

    Your high school sweetheart-where is he now? With 4.4 million alumni
    already registered at, there's a good chance you'll
    find her here. Visit your online high school class reunion at:

    Community email addresses:
      Post message:
      List owner:

    Shortcut URL to this page:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 25 2000 - 13:18:29 PDT