Excuse me,
I have been lurking on this list from the beginning
( I have read *all* the messages). I will try and
contribute more when the project reaches at point where
my expertise can be more effective.
On Fri, 05 May 2000 13:42:07 -0700, Eric Armstrong
<eric.armstrong@eng.sun.com> wrote:
[snip]
>Hierarchical
>------------
>This document, like the list of starting points mentioned earlier, is
>heavily hierarchical in nature -- as are most technical documents. These
>facts further underscore the need for a hierarchical system.
Why hierarchical? It would seem to me that the nature of the
*problem* would be better represented with a 'network' type data
structure. I'm sure that some of you must remember IDMS and
IDS-II type data bases. If there is something with that
structure which handles Objects, would not that be better?
What did I miss?
Dewain Delp
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you like to save big on your phone bill -- and keep on saving
more each month? Join beMANY! Our huge buying group gives you Long Distance
rates which fall monthly, plus an extra $60 in FREE calls!
http://click.egroups.com/1/2567/4/_/444287/_/957719624/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community email addresses:
Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 10:21:31 PDT