Sold me. But what do I know?
If the folks what matter buy it, I'm behind you 100%.
If not, never heard of ya...
:_)
Seriously:
I was inclined towards the MPL based on business
strategy. And then it sounded like it went even further
on patent protection. So MPL sounded like the winner
to me.
Who do we lose if the GPL option is not present?
And what does it cost us in confusion, if people have
to pick which license they plan to use. Does it make
that much harder for someone to try?
BTW: Does the license come into play when someone
uses the system, or only when they download source
code? I'd prefer the latter. If the former, is there
even simpler "license to use" we can provide for
people who don't want to look at the source code?
(The license you sign would then depend on which
bundle you download.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Europe, more than 219 million people will access Internet services
using mobile phones by 2003, according to Forrester Research.
Learn Wireless Development on
http://click.egroups.com/1/6222/5/_/444287/_/964218981/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community email addresses:
Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 21 2000 - 15:45:04 PDT