Re: [unrev-II] Visual stimuli & IBIS methodology

From: Peter Jones (ppj@concept67.fsnet.co.uk)
Date: Wed Oct 31 2001 - 13:44:06 PST

  • Next message: Peter Jones: "Re: [unrev-II] Intrinsic and Extrinsic Ratings wrt IBIS"

    Actually, I note in one of Simon Buckingham Shum's papers in the D3E
    environment
    http://d3e.open.ac.uk/general/negotiating-org-mem/
    "Negotiating the Construction of Organisational Memories ",
     that the gIBIS implementation notation shown has a mixed +/- icon for an
    argument.
    Interesting.

    Peter
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Peter Jones" <ppj@concept67.fsnet.co.uk>
    To: <unrev-II@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:23 PM
    Subject: [unrev-II] Visual stimuli & IBIS methodology

    > Hi,
    >
    > I've finally got around to reading some material explaining IBIS. In
    > particular I read this page
    > at http://www.gdss.com/wp/IBIS.htm
    > A short course on IBIS methodology and its use in the QuestMap
    > implementation.
    >
    > Reading through the materials something struck me as being a bit odd.
    > In the Question-Idea-Argument structure QuestMap appears to require that
    you
    > label an argument as Pro or Con with respective green plus sign and red
    > minus sign before the argument has even been worked out to its full
    extent.
    > Since the Ideas are supposed to be presented without intrinsic bias this
    > strikes me as rather counter to the spirit of the exercise. Not only that,
    > but I worry (because I'm the worrying kind) about the liminal
    psychological
    > effects that such blatant symbolism might have upon fair assessment of the
    > weight of arguments for the idea concerned. E.g. If I see many more green
    > plus signs than red minus signs I might assume a subconscious bias that an
    > idea has merit, when in fact a single Con argument might actually be the
    > most important.
    >
    > It would be interesting to hear the views of others on this matter.
    > Am I assuming a practice that the software doesn't actually permit, or
    does
    > QuestMap enforce it?
    > Has anyone had experience of it influencing matters unduly?
    >
    > Also, does Rittel's original formulation of IBIS contain this visual
    > 'loading'?
    > (Off to Google...)
    >
    > Cheers,
    > Peter
    >
    >
    > Peter Jones
    > ppj@concept67.fsnet.co.uk
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Community email addresses:
    > Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
    > Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
    > Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
    > List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
    >
    > Shortcut URL to this page:
    > http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >
    >

    ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
    Pinpoint the right security solution for your company- Learn how to add 128- bit encryption and to authenticate your web site with VeriSign's FREE guide!
    http://us.click.yahoo.com/yQix2C/33_CAA/yigFAA/IHFolB/TM
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

    Community email addresses:
      Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
      Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
      Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
      List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com

    Shortcut URL to this page:
      http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II

    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 13:31:42 PST