*MLs come later?

From: N. C a r r o l l (ncarroll@hastingsresearch.com)
Date: Mon Feb 12 2001 - 19:48:38 PST

Next message: Eugene Eric Kim: "Re: DKRs without the "K""
Previous message: N. C a r r o l l: "When and where?"
In reply to: Eric Armstrong: "Re: DKRs without the "K""
Next in thread: Eugene Eric Kim: "Re: *MLs come later?"
Reply: Eugene Eric Kim: "Re: *MLs come later?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

A quickie:
http://www.oasis-open.org/cover/grove-CFG.html

Gack indeed. Anyway I think *MLs are getting
premature attention. From Doug and most folks who
are looking at the lower levels, tables seems to be
the consensus.

And when the Earth was finished, God created
semantics, so that people could view things in
different ways....

> Gack. I did't realize groves were sgml.
> Is an xml version part of what Eugene is
> proposing?
>
> "N. C a r r o l l" wrote:
> >
> > Had a look at groves. It didn't make my day, but then SGML
> > rarely does.

--
________________________________
Nicholas Carroll
ncarroll@hastingsresearch.com
Travel: ncarroll@iname.com
http://www.hastingsresearch.com
________________________________

Next message: Eugene Eric Kim: "Re: DKRs without the "K""
Previous message: N. C a r r o l l: "When and where?"
In reply to: Eric Armstrong: "Re: DKRs without the "K""
Next in thread: Eugene Eric Kim: "Re: *MLs come later?"
Reply: Eugene Eric Kim: "Re: *MLs come later?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 17:58:01 PDT