Re: DKRs without the "K"

From: Eric Armstrong (eric.armstrong@eng.sun.com)
Date: Mon Feb 12 2001 - 18:14:49 PST

Next message: N. C a r r o l l: "When and where?"
Previous message: Eric Armstrong: "Re: defining what we mean by "collaboration""
In reply to: N. C a r r o l l: "Re: DKRs without the "K""
Next in thread: N. C a r r o l l: "*MLs come later?"
Reply: N. C a r r o l l: "*MLs come later?"
Reply: Eugene Eric Kim: "Re: DKRs without the "K""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Gack. I did't realize groves were sgml.
Is an xml version part of what Eugene is
proposing?

"N. C a r r o l l" wrote:
>
> Had a look at groves. It didn't make my day, but then SGML
> rarely does.
>

Next message: N. C a r r o l l: "When and where?"
Previous message: Eric Armstrong: "Re: defining what we mean by "collaboration""
In reply to: N. C a r r o l l: "Re: DKRs without the "K""
Next in thread: N. C a r r o l l: "*MLs come later?"
Reply: N. C a r r o l l: "*MLs come later?"
Reply: Eugene Eric Kim: "Re: DKRs without the "K""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 17:58:01 PDT