On 12 Aug 2000, Grant Bowman wrote:
> I think this can be summed up pretty clearly. mbox format inmport into
> XML is necessary. Later on in a future version this will be on the fly
> so nobody will have to convert anything. This is all not version 1
> stuff though, this is on the import side to get to XML, not the XML ->
> browser that is our version 1 as I understand it.
There's no reason why we can't do on-the-fly conversion of mbox to XML for
version 1. It really is a performance issue. The contents of an e-mail
that was sent shouldn't change, so there doesn't seem to be any reason to
do the conversion on-the-fly. However, if someone can come up with one,
it won't be hard to support this.
-- +=== Eugene Eric Kim ===== firstname.lastname@example.org ===== http://www.eekim.com/ ===+ | "Writer's block is a fancy term made up by whiners so they | +===== can have an excuse to drink alcohol." --Steve Martin ===========+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 17:57:50 PDT