----- Original Message -----
From: Lee Iverson <email@example.com>
> >> And this is actually the only difficult design issue that needs to be
> >> resolved given this architecture: when a Node is updated, do all
> >> documents which reference that Node automatically get updated as well?
> >? I don't think there's a choice there, since many links will
> Ah, but I haven't even started talking about links yet (or
> OHS-conforming docs for that matter). I'm only considering reuse of
> content within a repository (a la XInclude or somesuch).
Ah, I see. The lucidity of your prose led me to believe I had
captured the meaning. Yes, in that case I imagine "putting it
back on the user" makes sense. Or giving both user and
(Maybe we need some new terms for OHS, as "user" could
mean "the one who packaged a node with something else,"
i.e. "editor" -- or the final recipient of that package.)
Haven't found anything in Augment docs about this point.
But it might be worth asking Doug? He might have thought this
> Links and link management are a whole other matter entirely.
Links raise a similar issue, though: whatever the update
scheme is, the end-users have to know what they're looking
at. Discussed it with Sheldon earlier, and we are both of the
mind that color is a damn good way to communicate
(corrupted though it has been by the tutti-frutti stuff from
MS and web designers).
E.g., the HTML linkcolor spec could be extended:
In fact it could get much finer-grained than that.
(Color doesn't work for the color-blind -- but that
would be Sheldon's workaround.)
-- ________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org Travel: email@example.com http://www.hastingsresearch.com ________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 17:57:59 PDT