[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Indexes: Main | Date | Thread | Author

Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd:[Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts

To: mdupont777@yahoo.com
Cc: ba-ohs-talk@bootstrap.org
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 21:20:19 -0600 (MDT)
Message-id: <200204260320.g3Q3KJ005064@aztec.santafe.edu>

For the definition of "free software", see
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html.  I presume that
www.opensource.org gives the definition of "open source".    (01)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd:[Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts
  - From: Mark Szpakowski <szpak@well.com>
- Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd:[Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts
  - From: "John J. Deneen" <jjdeneen@netzero.net>

References:
- Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd:[Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts
  - From: James Michael DuPont <mdupont777@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts
Next by Date: [ba-ohs-talk] What's Better
Previous by thread: Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd:[Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts
Next by thread: Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd:[Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts
Indexes: Date | Thread | Author