ba-ohs-talk Mailing List (by date)

Indexes: Main | Thread | Date | Author Last Update: Wed May 01 00:30:07 GMT 2002

Time (GMT) Subject From # Followups
April 03, 2002
11:55 [ba-ohs-talk] Tinderbox: tool for visual concept structuring Simon Buckingham Shum 1
13:48 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Tinderbox: tool for visual concept structuring Mark Szpakowski 1
18:11 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Tinderbox: tool for visual concept structuring Alex Shapiro 1
19:03 [ba-ohs-talk] Instant Outlining Mark Szpakowski 1
19:06 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Tinderbox: tool for visual concept structuring Mark Szpakowski 1
April 04, 2002
16:27 [ba-ohs-talk] Thinking about graph structures: Fwd: [topicmapmail] Re: Emancipating Instances from the Tyranny of Class Jack Park 0
April 05, 2002
02:37 [ba-ohs-talk] Fwd: CG: OpenCyc has been released Jack Park 0
19:41 [ba-ohs-talk] Doug's talk at Berkeley April 8 - note revised Room number Mei Lin Fung 1
19:43 [ba-ohs-talk] Multi-valent Browser Mei Lin Fung 1
20:36 [ba-ohs-talk] Event Monday (Blue Sky) Kevin Keck 0
20:38 [ba-ohs-talk] Upcoming events in April Mei Lin Fung 0
22:08 [ba-ohs-talk] Fwd: [PORT-L] [Fwd: Scientific Computing & Scripting Language Extension] Jack Park 0
April 06, 2002
00:34 [ba-ohs-talk] Reed's Law - Group-Forming Networks (GFNs) John Maloney 1
02:59 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Multi-valent Browser John J. Deneen 0
03:21 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] The Endeavour Expedition: Charting the Fluid Information Utility John J. Deneen 0
03:50 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Reed's Law - Group-Forming Networks (GFNs) Joe D Williams 1
14:41 [ba-ohs-talk] The perfect email client Jack Park 1
17:00 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] The perfect email client John Sechrest 0
19:15 RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Reed's Law - Group-Forming Networks (GFNs) John Maloney 0
23:54 [ba-ohs-talk] Fwd: CG: Common Logic Standard Jack Park 1
April 07, 2002
19:49 [ba-ohs-talk] Free trial version Neurodesigner software Henry K van Eyken 1
April 08, 2002
17:16 [ba-ohs-talk] Multi Valent Browser demo location Room 373 & reminder about Doug's talk at Berkeley today Mei Lin Fung 1
18:43 [ba-ohs-talk] Google API alex@touchgraph.com 0
19:33 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Free trial version Neurodesigner software Peter Jones 0
20:28 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Fwd: CG: Common Logic Standard Peter Jones 2
21:25 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Fwd: CG: Common Logic Standard Peter Jones 0
April 09, 2002
08:29 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Fwd: CG: Common Logic Standard Kevin Keck 0
12:51 [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove Henry K van Eyken 1
16:54 RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove John Maloney 1
April 10, 2002
03:43 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove Malcolm Dean 2
11:01 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove Murray Altheim 0
16:30 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove Henry K van Eyken 1
17:38 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove Mark Szpakowski 1
18:57 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Call for Action: Multivalent Browser for CITRIS & CODIAK Collaboratories? John J. Deneen 0
20:07 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove Henry K van Eyken 3
20:47 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Tinderbox: tool for visual concept structuring Mark Szpakowski 0
22:46 RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove Michael Crusoe 0
April 11, 2002
00:48 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove Johannes Ernst 1
05:32 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove Eugene Eric Kim 1
05:44 [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Eugene Eric Kim 4
09:51 [ba-ohs-talk] Co-authoring [was: Learning Groove] Murray Altheim 1
10:18 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove Murray Altheim 0
11:18 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Murray Altheim 0
11:30 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Co-authoring [was: Learning Groove] Henry K van Eyken 1
11:45 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Co-authoring [was: Learning Groove] Murray Altheim 1
12:21 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted albert.m.selvin 0
16:21 RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove John Maloney 1
16:53 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Peter P. Yim 0
18:20 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove Murray Altheim 1
18:42 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Co-authoring [was: Learning Groove] Henry K van Eyken 0
20:52 RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove John Maloney 3
April 12, 2002
00:22 [ba-ohs-talk] A Groove of Learning Joe D Williams 0
00:55 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Eric Armstrong 1
02:27 RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove Jack Park 1
10:25 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Murray Altheim 1
12:02 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove Murray Altheim 2
16:02 RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove John Maloney 2
16:29 RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove John Maloney 3
17:16 [ba-ohs-talk] The Microsoft Assumption Henry K van Eyken 2
17:50 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] The Microsoft Assumption Johannes Ernst 1
18:33 [ba-ohs-talk] Microsoft Assumption and McAfee 6.0 Rod Welch 1
19:01 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] The Microsoft Assumption Mark Szpakowski 0
19:16 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove Mark Szpakowski 0
19:19 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove Mark Szpakowski 0
23:28 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Microsoft Assumption and McAfee 6.0 Henry K van Eyken 0
April 14, 2002
15:12 [ba-ohs-talk] RDF toolkit Jack Park 0
15:20 [ba-ohs-talk] Fwd: [PORT-L] Nadin on Anticipation Jack Park 4
17:45 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Fwd: [PORT-L] Nadin on Anticipation Mark Szpakowski 1
18:12 Who me? WAS: Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Fwd: [PORT-L] Nadin on Anticipation Peter Jones 0
18:35 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Fwd: [PORT-L] Nadin on Anticipation Peter Jones 0
18:40 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Fwd: [PORT-L] Nadin on Anticipation Peter Jones 0
19:22 [ba-ohs-talk] Anticipation driven by intelligence Rod Welch 0
April 15, 2002
10:06 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Learning Groove Murray Altheim 0
17:48 [ba-ohs-talk] Groove V2.0 John Maloney 1
18:39 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Groove V2.0 Mark Szpakowski 0
22:56 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Eric Armstrong 3
23:26 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Joe D Williams 0
April 16, 2002
10:28 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Murray Altheim 2
10:47 [ba-ohs-talk] Fwd: anybody else checked out Eclipse? Jack Park 0
14:27 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Simon Buckingham Shum 1
15:14 [ba-ohs-talk] TextArc -- Visual text imaging Jack Park 0
16:27 [ba-ohs-talk] Mind Mapping story Kevin Keck 0
21:45 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Lee Iverson 1
22:34 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Peter Jones 1
22:58 [ba-ohs-talk] FAQ Organizer Jack Park 3
23:26 [ba-ohs-talk] Autonomic Computing Jack Park 1
23:58 [ba-ohs-talk] Fwd: [xml-dev] ANN: MXP1 beta1 - fast and small parsing engine for XMLPULL Jack Park 0
23:58 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Eric Armstrong 0
April 17, 2002
00:39 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] FAQ Organizer Eric Armstrong 0
00:43 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] FAQ Organizer Eric Armstrong 1
01:22 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] FAQ Organizer Jack Park 0
02:16 [ba-ohs-talk] Autonomic Computing for a Breakthrough Rod Welch 0
03:50 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Alex Shapiro 4
03:55 [ba-ohs-talk] relationships -> graph tool? John Sechrest 2
04:02 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] relationships -> graph tool? Jack Park 0
04:08 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] relationships -> graph tool? Alex Shapiro 0
08:22 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Stephen Danic 0
09:03 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Simon Buckingham Shum 0
14:41 [ba-ohs-talk] argument for delayed categorization Alex Shapiro 0
16:29 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Lee Iverson 1
17:25 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Peter Jones 1
19:24 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Lee Iverson 0
20:05 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Eric Armstrong 2
April 18, 2002
01:34 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Mark Szpakowski 0
06:43 RE: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts James Michael DuPont 0
10:26 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Murray Altheim 1
15:45 [ba-ohs-talk] Ultra-Personal Computer John Maloney 2
17:29 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Joe D Williams 0
18:47 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Alex Shapiro 0
20:32 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Ultra-Personal Computer Peter Jones 0
20:40 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Ultra-Personal Computer Peter Jones 0
21:40 [ba-ohs-talk] Freezope learning environments Peter Jones 1
22:34 [ba-ohs-talk] FYI/CrossPost : Fwd: Example SQL and XML of DOTGNU/CSCC/csnodes.c James Michael DuPont 0
22:38 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] new version of graph model paper posted Eric Armstrong 0
22:47 [ba-ohs-talk] [Fwd: APIs Considered Harmful] Eric Armstrong 0
23:56 [ba-ohs-talk] Re: **** Instant Outlining !!! *** Eric Armstrong 1
April 19, 2002
00:14 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Re: **** Instant Outlining !!! *** Eric Armstrong 2
01:45 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] XWeb XML/XSLT publishing system Eric Armstrong 0
02:46 [ba-ohs-talk] Database report generator DataVision Jack Park 0
03:30 [ba-ohs-talk] Outlining Hopfully Not like Email to Communication Rod Welch 1
04:21 Great? idea for improving this list (was Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Freezope learning environments) Alex Shapiro 2
04:38 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Re: **** Instant Outlining !!! *** Alex Shapiro 0
15:10 [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing to Improve Email and IT Rod Welch 1
16:42 [ba-ohs-talk] Progress on a project to organize email archives cdent 1
16:53 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Progress on a project to organize email archives cdent 0
20:06 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] FAQ Organizer Eric Armstrong 1
20:16 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing to Improve Email and IT Eric Armstrong 1
21:11 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Re: **** Instant Outlining !!! *** play machine 1
22:11 [ba-ohs-talk] The Potential of "Instant Outlining" Eric Armstrong 0
22:44 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Re: **** Instant Outlining !!! *** Eric Armstrong 1
April 20, 2002
06:43 [ba-ohs-talk] "Exploring New Frontiers & Paradigms" John J. Deneen 0
10:42 [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** Instant Outlining !!! ***] Murray Altheim 1
16:42 RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing to Improve Email and IT Garold (Gary) L. Johnson 1
22:56 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing to Improve Email and IT N. Carroll 1
April 21, 2002
06:09 RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing to Improve Email and IT John Maloney 2
16:45 [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing to Improve Email and IT Rod Welch 1
19:25 [ba-ohs-talk] Google Outline Browser Alex Shapiro 0
19:52 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts Jack Park 1
23:50 RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing to Improve Email and IT John Maloney 0
23:52 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts Richard Stallman 4
April 22, 2002
03:08 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing to Improve Email and IT N. Carroll 1
03:08 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts N. Carroll 0
05:41 [ba-ohs-talk] TouchGraph WikiBrowser V1.01 Alex Shapiro 0
10:33 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts Bill Bearden 0
14:21 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing to Improve Email and IT Mark Szpakowski 2
15:53 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts James Michael DuPont 1
15:55 RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing to Improve Email and IT John Maloney 0
17:07 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts Jack Park 1
21:48 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** Instant Outlining !!! ***] Eric Armstrong 1
22:01 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts James Michael DuPont 0
22:23 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts Richard Stallman 1
22:32 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts Jack Park 2
April 23, 2002
09:07 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** Instant Outlining !!! ***] Murray Altheim 2
14:38 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** Instant Outlining !!! ***] Jack Park 2
14:54 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** Instant Outlining !!! ***] Murray Altheim 1
15:03 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** Instant Outlining !!! ***] Jack Park 1
15:22 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** Instant Outlining !!! ***] Murray Altheim 1
15:29 [ba-ohs-talk] iText Text processing tools Jack Park 0
16:56 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts Mark Szpakowski 1
19:39 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts James Michael DuPont 0
21:58 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** Instant Outlining !!! ***] Eric Armstrong 0
April 24, 2002
00:03 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** Instant Outlining!!! ***] Eric Armstrong 1
00:11 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** Instant Outlining!!!***] Sandy Klausner 3
00:26 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** Instant Outlining!!!***] Eric Armstrong 2
00:34 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** Instant Outlining!!! ***] Jack Park 0
00:41 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** Instant Outlining!!!***] Jack Park 1
00:43 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** InstantOutlining!!!***] Sandy Klausner 0
01:00 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** Instant Outlining!!!***] Jack Park 0
06:41 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** Instant Outlining !!! ***] Alex Shapiro 1
07:28 [ba-ohs-talk] Displaying back links (for paragraphs!) Alex Shapiro 0
10:10 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** Instant Outlining!!! ***] Murray Altheim 0
10:49 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Node Sequencing [Was: **** Instant Outlining !!! ***] Murray Altheim 0
18:01 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts Richard Stallman 2
19:01 [ba-ohs-talk] TG Based (almost) Google Browser Alex Shapiro 0
22:13 [ba-ohs-talk] Fwd: [xml-dev] Tutorials on Cocoon 2 Jack Park 0
23:01 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd:[Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts Eric Armstrong 1
23:02 Re: Great? idea for improving this list (was Re: [ba-ohs-talk]Freezope learning environments) Eugene Eric Kim 1
23:06 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing to Improve Email and IT Eugene Eric Kim 1
23:09 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing to Improve Email and IT John Sechrest 0
April 25, 2002
08:08 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd:[Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts James Michael DuPont 1
11:30 Re: Great? idea for improving this list (was Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Freezope learning environments) Murray Altheim 1
11:35 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts Murray Altheim 3
15:08 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts Jack Park 1
16:37 [ba-ohs-talk] :zz: ZigZag patent and trademark [Was: **** Instant Outlining !!! ***] Ted Nelson 2
16:38 [ba-ohs-talk] :zz: Please say "zzstructure", not Gzz, if former is meant Ted Nelson 0
16:49 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] :zz: ZigZag patent and trademark [Was: **** Instant Outlining !!! ***] Jack Park 0
16:54 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] :zz: ZigZag patent and trademark [Was: **** Instant Outlining !!! ***] Jack Park 2
17:09 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] :zz: ZigZag patent and trademark [Was: **** Instant Outlining !!! ***] Murray Altheim 0
20:29 [ba-ohs-talk] Great Example Joe D Williams 0
21:06 Re: Great? idea for improving this list (was Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Freezope learning environments) Peter Jones 3
21:31 Re: Great? idea for improving this list (was Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Freezope learning environments) Eric Armstrong 0
22:07 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts Eric Armstrong 0
22:10 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd:[Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts Eric Armstrong 1
22:38 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd:[Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts Murray Altheim 0
23:27 Re: Great? idea for improving this list (was Re: [ba-ohs-talk]Freezope learning environments) cdent 3
23:33 [ba-ohs-talk] Re: Great? idea for improving this list (was Re: [ba-ohs-talk]Freezope learning environments) Eric Armstrong 0
April 26, 2002
00:03 Re: Great? idea for improving this list (was Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Freezope learning environments) Mark Szpakowski 1
00:44 Re: Great? idea for improving this list (was Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Freezope learning environments) Eric Armstrong 0
05:39 [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing Alex Shapiro 2
05:40 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd: [Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts Richard Stallman 0
05:40 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd:[Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts Richard Stallman 2
05:57 [ba-ohs-talk] What's Better Alex Shapiro 0
06:26 [ba-ohs-talk] Signal from Singapore, day3, Wednesday and Day 4 Thursday April 25 Mei Lin Fung 1
09:56 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing Murray Altheim 3
12:51 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd:[Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts Mark Szpakowski 1
12:55 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing Mark Szpakowski 0
18:05 Re: Great? idea for improving this list (was Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Freezope learning environments) Peter Jones 1
19:42 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Signal from Singapore, day3, Wednesday and Day 4 Thursday April 25 John J. Deneen 0
20:58 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License: Fwd:[Gxl] GCC Licencing and XML extracts John J. Deneen 1
22:13 Re: Great? idea for improving this list (was Re: [ba-ohs-talk]Freezope learning environments) cdent 3
22:23 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing cdent 1
23:33 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing Eric Armstrong 1
April 27, 2002
00:32 [ba-ohs-talk] GPL as a "chaordic" constitution for augmentation (was re: More bad news...) Paul Fernhout 1
01:39 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] GPL as a "chaordic" constitution for augmentation (was re: More bad news...) Jack Park 1
05:10 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] GPL as a "chaordic" constitution foraugmentation (was re: More bad news...) Paul Fernhout 1
15:32 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] GPL as a "chaordic" constitution foraugmentation (was re: More bad news...) Jack Park 0
16:21 Re: Great? idea for improving this list (was Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Freezope learning environments) Peter Jones 0
16:29 Re: Great? idea for improving this list (was Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Freezope learning environments) Peter Jones 1
20:46 [ba-ohs-talk] Text 2 XML Jack Park 0
22:26 RE: Great? idea for improving this list (was Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Freezope learning environments) Garold (Gary) L. Johnson 1
April 28, 2002
11:58 BA Archive Index WAS: Re: Great? idea for improving this list (was Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Freezope learning environments) Peter Jones 1
April 29, 2002
12:59 Re: Great? idea for improving this list (was Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Freezope learning environments) Murray Altheim 0
13:05 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing Murray Altheim 1
13:13 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing Murray Altheim 1
13:14 [ba-ohs-talk] BA archive index Peter Jones 1
20:05 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] BA archive index Peter Jones 0
21:37 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing Eric Armstrong 0
April 30, 2002
03:43 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing Alex Shapiro 1
06:57 [ba-ohs-talk] Searching vs. Keyword Indexing Alex Shapiro 1
07:32 RE: [ba-ohs-talk] More bad news about the GPL License Dennis E. Hamilton 0
08:45 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing Murray Altheim 1
14:36 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing Alex Shapiro 1
15:09 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing Murray Altheim 0
18:01 [ba-ohs-talk] Virtual HyperGlossary (VHG), incl. the VirtualXML Glossary John J. Deneen 0
18:55 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing blincoln 4
19:23 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing N. Carroll 1
19:52 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing John J. Deneen 0
20:46 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing Peter Jones 1
21:05 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing Peter Jones 0
21:24 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing Eric Armstrong 0
21:28 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Searching vs. Keyword Indexing Eric Armstrong 0
May 01, 2002
00:25 Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Keyword Indexing Kevin Keck 0

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.2