Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Solving complex problems
Another excellent post, clarifying the need to identify each
stakeholder's concerns, as a preliminary first step in any
negotiation process. (01)
I'd *really* like to see equilibrium theory involved in the
next step -- carrying out the negotiations. (02)
Unfortunately, one of the books that promises an explanation
isn't available, and the other appears to be on a slowboat, so
I'm winging it here, but the gist of what I understand is: (03)
* If a proposal maximizes my benefit, AND it maximizes the
benefit of the group as a whole (which is most likely the
mini-max, or saddle point in the benefits curves) (04)
* AND if I can demonstrate to all concerned that this IS
the mini-max point. (05)
* THEN, the proposed solution is both optimal and ideal, and
must surely be accepted. (06)
I suspect that "clarifying concerns" is the first step in that process.
After that, reasoning tools, models, and other tools of reason-based
persuasion are necessary. (07)