Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Where is Kananaskis?
> unconstitutional because of words 'under God,' according to The
Associated (01)
Difficult for a Hindu-American, or a practising Buddhist, that one. (02)
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Maloney" <jtmalone@pacbell.net>
To: <ba-unrev-talk@bootstrap.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 8:59 PM
Subject: RE: [ba-unrev-talk] Where is Kananaskis? (03)
>
> Here is another 'Good One' (ha-ha-ha) on The Republic's slippery slope
to
> oblivion.
>
> "-- Federal appeals court (9th Circuit) rules Pledge of Allegiance
> unconstitutional because of words 'under God,' according to The
Associated
> Press."
>
> These judges are on the fast-track to ambassadors of World Government.
>
> Besides, they've already done enough good in San Francisco.
>
>
> (BTW, The 9th Circuit is the most liberal and the most overturned
appeals
> court in the country. The three-judge panel was not unanimous in the
ruling.
> Whew!)
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ba-unrev-talk@bootstrap.org
> [mailto:owner-ba-unrev-talk@bootstrap.org]On Behalf Of Peter Jones
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:41 PM
> To: ba-unrev-talk@bootstrap.org
> Subject: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Where is Kananaskis?
>
>
> > Why are ALL these insidious meta-government meetings sealed-off and
> top
> > secret?
>
> Maybe they are just too boring to be made public
> without losing image points.
>
> --
> Peter
>
> (04)