My experience in developing programs using XML is that there is quite a bit
of coding necessary to satisfy a particular DTD. I believe that IBM has a
set of Java beans that will take a DTD and write Java classes to handle all
the elements. That's been the key, in my experience: there needs to be code
to handle specific elements of a DTD. I do not yet know what will be the
case for XML schemas. I suspect that the case is a bit simpler with RDF,
since you really only have a couple of generic elements, and resources --
perhaps one size fits all.
Jack Park
\From: Eric Armstrong <eric.armstrong@eng.sun.com>
> A fascinating look at some of the limitations of XML.
> The discussion of MathML was *actually* done is quite
> fascinating, along with a similar business example.
> It shows that even "XML" data may in fact require
> proprietary engines to do the processing.
>
> We'll have to keep the MathML model in mind, *just in
> case* XML by itself doesn't get us where we need to go...
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Tepid water ...
> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:28:56 -0800
> To: xml-tech@eng.sun.com
>
> For those that haven't seen this, I thought it
> was quite interesting:
>
> http://www.interlog.com/~gray/markup-abuse.html
>
> Philip
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DON'T HATE YOUR RATE!
Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as
0.0% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees.
Apply NOW!
http://click.egroups.com/1/2120/3/_/444287/_/954773404/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community email addresses:
Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 03 2000 - 07:57:34 PDT