RE: [unrev-II] Nailing Jello To The Wall

From: Jack Park (
Date: Tue Oct 23 2001 - 08:53:02 PDT

  • Next message: Jack Park: "more RE: [unrev-II] Nailing Jello To The Wall"

    Back up to Elayne Coakes' home page from the URL you suggest and you will
    find links to a number of useful papers, one of which is
    in which she orbits around definitions of knowledge. An excerpt:
    "How Can We Define Knowledge?
    There are many definitions in the literature as to what knowledge consists
    of and how it can be distinguished from data or information. Ackoff himself
    says that data are symbols that represent the properties of objects and
    events. Information is processed data and is contained in descriptions of
    'who', 'what' 'where' etc. Knowledge is conveyed by instructions and
    understanding by explanations.
    Knowledge can be described as being either Tacit or Explicit.
    Tacit knowledge is:
    subconsciously understood or applied
    difficult to articulate
    developed from direct action and experience
    shared through conversation, story-telling etc
    Explicit knowledge:
    can be precisely and formally articulated
    is easy to codify, document, transfer, share
    There are several different types of knowledge that we can distinguish. In
    particular theorists have discussed declarative knowledge ( which is
    knowledge about something - a shared understanding of concepts,
    categories); procedural knowledge (which is knowledge of how something
    happens); and causal knowledge (which is knowledge of why something happens
    and can thus enable strategy formulation).
    Additionally knowledge can be considered general. That is a broad type of
    knowledge that is publicly available and independent of events.
    Alternatively it can be considered specific, which is context related and
    which needs focal knowledge in order to be described and meaningful. These
    categories are different but complementary to the seven ways of knowing
    discussed by Lazear 1991.
    Knowledge Plus Understanding
    To return to Ackoff's quotation discussed at the beginning of this paper,
    knowledge without understanding is only a part of the equation. Introna
    [1997] also discusses this aspect when looking at the idea of the
    hermeneutic circle. He argues that information must change the recipient,
    it must lead to a level of interpretation and understanding. The
    hermeneutic circle is the dialectic process of understanding."

    At 05:29 PM 10/23/2001 +0200, you wrote:
    >Thanks for this great post Jack. I browsed through it and I like the
    >approach of attempting to reconcile technology and appreciation. I also
    >need to re-read Pirsig's book...
    >Actually, King's objectives are very similar to the Socio-Technical
    >approach. A 50 year old approach to organizational change which advocates
    >the simultaneous and continuous optimization of the social and technical
    >sides of an organization. Check out the book called The New Socio-Tech:
    >>-----Original Message-----
    >>From: Jack Park []
    >>Sent: dimanche, 21. octobre 2001 18:20
    >>Subject: [unrev-II] Nailing Jello To The Wall
    > From the top of the page:
    >"You look pretty much
    >the same as I
    >and our alphabet begins
    >with an "A" and even our
    >show the same
    >when scrawled on a
    >But I don't understand how you
    >the world from behind
    >the screen when I look in from the
    >And I wonder
    >is there room for me back there
    >or for you out here
    >or maybe we can just
    >around the boundaries and
    >-- sjking, '97
    >The page is about communication: programmers and users.
    >"This research grew out of my proposal that an in-depth study of the
    >relational differences and similarities of people in the roles of
    >programmer and user would show that this often-perceived gap is less
    >dichotomous than either side of the communication struggle may assume. I
    >found, however, evidence that continues to suggest that there is indeed a
    >strong difference between the ways of thinking, so the bulk of my analysis
    >continued with this finding in mind. Robert Pirsig (Zen and the Art of
    >Motorcycle Maintenance, 1974) draws distinctions between classical versus
    >romantic ways of understanding, then bridges this gap with "quality" -- an
    >identifiable, yet elusive concept and reality. This Action Research
    >Practicum draws heavily upon both my own and Pirsig's philosophies of
    >technology and quality and how differing world views color the
    >understanding between different groups."

    ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
    Get your FREE VeriSign guide to security solutions for your web site: encrypting transactions, securing intranets, and more!

    Community email addresses:
      Post message:
      List owner:

    Shortcut URL to this page:

    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Oct 23 2001 - 08:47:32 PDT