Next message: Gil Regev: "Social Networks Analysis, was RE: [unrev-II] Greetings"
Hi Ping.
Great to hear from you on this list. I have previously seen your
work on criticons, and the Gnutella visualization. What I didn't
realize was that both were your projects. I am very happy that you
have been involved in both, because the two nicely bound my own research
area: Graph Based Interfaces for categorization, and more
interestingly, GBI's as the evolution of hypertext.
You can see demo's of some of my projects at
http://www.touchgraph.com
The two main examples are right on the main page, and others can be
seen by clicking the "news" tab. The most interesting one
here is the map of weblogs, demonstrating TG's potential to depict social
networks.
Thanks for the links, I have lots to say about all of them so read on for
comments.
At 05:34 AM 11/26/01 -0800, Ka-Ping Yee wrote:
Here are some
tidbits:
- Graph visualization has been mentioned here. I
recently
did a project for an info-viz class that
ended up as a paper;
it got mentioned on Slashdot (probably due
to our choice of
Gnutella as an example domain, rather than
the graph layout
and animation technique that is the real
work in the paper).
See:
http://bailando.sims.berkeley.edu/infovis.html
This is a beautiful project. I especially like the illustrations of
the radial layout technique that have the purple background. ... The
purple is there only for show, right? It still looks cool
though.
I think that a radial layout is the optimal technique for illustrating
the distance that nodes are from a selected focus node. Using this
technique to illustrate the connections in the Gnutella network is
perfect, because each user will probably be most interested in
themselves, and their immediate neighborhood.
I really like the way the transitions are done too. One comment
though, the layout does not take into account "non-tree" edges
right? The marital-ties graph look pretty good, but the nice layout
was "faked" (to some degree), or was it? (It seems to me that
had the layout been automatic, the graphs could have been rearranged to
avoid intersections).
- IBIS has
been mentioned a lot. One of my dreams is to build
an e-mail archiver that produces output
like this:
See:
http://lfw.org/ping/criticons/
Very nice. I especially like the fact that it seems that the pretty
structure on the left could be generated automatically by putting the [#]
marks in a text based email. This would also make it easy to
exchange mail with non-criticons enabled applications. Seems like
such an application would not be too hard to implement either, a simple
script should do it. The only thing that prevents me from doing so,
(besides that fact that I feer that it's not as simple as it sounds), is
that it seems that post-level organisation is more important then
intra-post organization.
- Facets,
categories, and metadata were also mentioned. Marti
Hearst, my advisor, is also interested in
visualization
and information retrieval. I'm the
core developer on her
research project, Flamenco, which is about
faceted metadata
and how to make it usable. Our team
has designed, and i've
built, a series of prototypes for an image
database browser.
It's not ready for prime-time, but if
you're curious (and
gentle with it), you might want to have a
look:
See:
http://bailando.sims.berkeley.edu/flamenco/
(Choose "development system",
then try "FrankenFacet",
"FrankenMatrix",
"NewSingleTree", or "Interface 4".)
Wow. This is definately the way to go (as opposed to yahoo-like
hierarchies), especially for images. I think that this project
might be very applicable to the
http://www.gettyimages.com/
database. (Do a search, and click on an image, you get a list of keywords that apply to it).
The best part of the interface is the category refinements that appear to the left in the FrankenFacet, and FrankenMatrix views. Having found an initial first category that one is interested in, one is now presented with a greatly reduced list of options that can help to quickly narrow the search.
I really can't say enough good things about faceted classification. It makes so much sence to assign more then just one category per object as hierarchies force you to do. The only trick is to figure out how to navigate the resulting structure. Flamenco seems to have got a lot of it figured out. I like the horizontal divisions for the current category. Something else that I though was cool, was when I selected a category with 5000 items, I was prompted to choose another category because there were too many items to display. This is exactly the way it should work.
I just played with that Smithsonian exhibit, "Revealing Things".
It's pretty cool.
-- ?!ng
The only way to go is up. The problem so far has been that people have been slow to transition away from metaphors based on physical space. Thus the hierarchies, that closely model a file cabinet, or a library.
"Cyber" space allows one to represent objects in multiple dimensions (like thinkmap's Smithsonian museum exhibit), and whether one likes it or not, such objects spring up by themselves anyway (Gnutella networks for instance). The trick now is to design better interfaces for navigating this space. So... things are only going to get cooler.
--Alex
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |
 |
 |
Community email addresses:
Post message: unrev-II@onelist.com
Subscribe: unrev-II-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: unrev-II-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: unrev-II-owner@onelist.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/unrev-II
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0
: Mon Nov 26 2001 - 21:15:09 PST