Re: [ba-ohs-talk] Re: Rethinking Licensing
That is one great document. It doesn't cover issues of
version control and a couple of other things, but it is one
heck of a great start. (01)
My own take on the requirements are captured here:
I'd start with the Requirements for Collaborative Design/Discussion
System (Winter-Spring 2000). (03)
I believe Eugene worked up a later summary that took some
of its better features and combined with a lot of the material
that came up in our email discussions. Lee and Henry may
have put something together, as well. (Unfortunately, I am
horrible at keeping track of other people's documents.) (04)
Paul Fernhout wrote: (05)
> James Michael DuPont wrote:
> > Paul,
> > please let me ask this to all of you.
> > If the OHS will not be able to at first contribute
> > code.
> > You and Eric both have a profound command of the
> > english language.
> > My command is of C/C++/SQL and Perl.
> > Would you provide instead of software, as a group
> > a SPECIFICATION that can be implemented as a GPLed
> > program by someone like me? A modular design that
> > allows for a core of GPLed code that protects the
> > investment, and is easily modified.
> Here is a starting point:
> Various discussions here have taken some of the ideas in it further, but
> that document is probably a good place to start.
> -Paul Fernhout
> Kurtz-Fernhout Software
> Developers of custom software and educational simulations
> Creators of the Garden with Insight(TM) garden simulator
> http://www.kurtz-fernhout.com (06)