Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Whither ba-unrev?
I second the sentiments expressed in both paragraphs., and should add
the possibility of taking Jack's NextWiki route. (01)
Critical at this juncture, I believe, is a facilitator to serve as
"discussion master" to stimulate moves from talk to action. Or, perhaps,
distinct discussion "thread masters" to nudge particular ideas along on
their paths to fruition. (02)
May I suggest to persons willing to devote some of their energy to such
a function to privately mail their intentions to Doug's administrative
assistant, Mary Coppernoll - coppernoll@bootstrap.org (03)
I imagine that a particularly challenging aspect of this is that it is a
(as far as I know) yet unheard approach in discussion groups, hence it
involves a bit of pioneering. (04)
Henry (05)
Mei Lin Fung wrote: (06)
><snip>
>How could this discussion group organize itself so that those who want
>to do x, can talk about x and those who want to do Y, can talk about Y.
>Yet have some way to peek over at the other groups to see what they are
>up to?
>
>What small step could we take today? Is John Maloney's suggestion about
>Groove something we should consider, as a way to facilitate forward
>motion beyond talk? We don't have to stop at Groove,.... we could start
>from Groove.
><snip>
>
> (07)