Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: International Purple Numbering Standard?
Actually I was thinking about:
1) the format of the syntax that gives rise to the purple numbers on the web(?)
page.
2) the numbering format used.
3) the frequency of numbering in text - e.g. paragraph numbers with subordinate
numbers for every three lines or so. (01)
<p>
[p1]
[p1.0]line
line
line
[p1.3]line
</p>
where square brackets represent some purple numbering. (02)
My reasoning was that some standardisation in these areas would provide coding
advantages further down the line - especially for projects like PurpleSlurple
where it might not make sense to overlay two sets of purple numbering if a page
is already numbered. With standardisation a comparatively simple detection
routine could be used to turn off secondary numbering. (03)
Comments appreciated. (04)
Cheers,
--
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Schneider" <matsch@sasites.com>
To: <ba-unrev-talk@bootstrap.org>
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: [ba-unrev-talk] Re: International Purple Numbering Standard? (05)
On Friday 04 October 2002 09:59, Matthew Schneider wrote: (06)
> So, belaboring this analogy a bit longer, in my day I might have read the
> report (on paper) and gone to my library to check the source:
> myhometown/mylibrary/bookshelf6/book34/page23/paragraph3 and you similarly
> (in another state)
> yourhometown/yourlibrary/bookshelf8/book4/page233/paragraph13 (note that I
> was reading from a stand alone version of "Romeo and Juliet" while you were
> reading from Shakespeare's complete works). (07)
(laughing) Of course in my analogy we both use the dewey decimal
classification system to retrieve the book. :/ (08)
Here's an example where two different Purple systems lead to the same source
paragraph:
http://mas.homelinux.net/~matsch/potf.php?theurl=http://www.eekim.com/software/p
urple/purple.html#purp97
and: http://www.eekim.com/software/purple/purple.html#hid2 (09)
Ok maybe we DO need some standardization. (010)
M. (011)